Trilogies are a tricky breed of movie convention. So many things can go wrong–and they have. Some creators don’t know when to stop (hello Sly, hello George) and they flew right past the three film mark. The crazy up and down quality levels of Rocky, Rambo and Star Wars could probably be a whole other blog, but I digress.
Some, like Wachowski siblings, had an excellent film in the Matrix, only to then do two sequels that weren’t nearly as well received. I don’t know if they simply never intended to do more, but the studio backed up the money truck and if so, it’s hard to turn down the extra millions. Or maybe they *did* have a plan but the latter two thirds were simply not good parts of the plan. I’m not sure if the Wachowski’s really ever hit the same heights again with any of their films but they never got a chance to do any more trilogies (I don’t believe).
Two excellent examples of “should have stopped at two” are the Sam Raimi Spider-man films and the Chris Nolan Dark Knight films.
Raimi’s Spider-man 1 and (especially) 2 are still regarded as the best Spider-films by most fans. The whole main Ock/Spidey train battle in 2 represents some of the best old school Marvel material including even the current MCU output. But then something happened. Raimi decided to co-write the next one with his brother, which resulted in MJ being depicted in the worst light possible, and Sandman being awkwardly wedged into the Uncle Ben death show, AND being a sobbing sad sack. And of course Peter and the dancing and the bangs. At least we got the lovely Gwen Stacy. Too bad it was in this film. Raimi *was* slated to film 4 & 5 together and being the old school fan he was, dollars to doughnuts, there’d be a Sinister Sixth movie to end on. But Sam found out the hard way that fans can be fickle. Maybe he just didn’t take 3 seriously? Maybe that was because the studio insisted on inserting a next gen villain like Venom in there? Don’t know.
Christopher Nolan did a great take on the caped crusader in Batman Begins and followed it up with the epic Dark Knight. He even publicly stated that he put everything he had into DK. The tank was empty. But siren call of “trilogy” rang out, perhaps again with the money truck. I bring up the money truck only because they had plenty of room to drive it through all the many plot holes and past the inanities and idiocy of Dark Knight Rises. At least we got the entertaining Bane. But yeah, Sam and Chris should have stopped while they were ahead.
I suppose we could also throw the Godfather in there. Shouldn’t have gone for three but they dragged ‘em back in!
Superman the movie led off a string of movies, but since Superman 1 and 2 was originally one script, one *could* say they ended up with a trilogy with 3 and 4. But the point is moot, because whether you count either as the third movie, there’s little quality in the former and none in the latter. 4 (The Quest for Peace) ranks down there near the bottom of all superhero films and is a cautionary tale regarding trilogies or quadralogies.
1989’s wonderful and successful Batman led off a very similar descent into crap, lowering standards a bit in Returns, sinking very low in Forever and plunging to the bottom area, nestled comfortably with Superman 4 and the Spirit. Again, the third movie was a bad idea, so it’s no wonder people would start to roll their eyes when there was talk of a third movie.
Even the X-men franchise was vulnerable. I myself like The Last Stand, but many didn’t. Although some are changing their tune after the X-producers decided to do *another* trilogy on top of the old one and once again failed to produce a winner with Age of Apocalypse. Then they added Dark Phoenix to confuse and depress people.
Sony tried the Amazing Spider-man but it only got to a second film as it tanked worst than the first.
But then there are the successes.
Toy Story’s maintained a solid quality across four movies. Men in Black arguably did as well for their first three films (international was the start of a new trilogy I believe and a very different one).
The Wolverine trilogy is the most uncommon of all. That rare breed that started off with an “so-so” film set in the past (X-men Origins: Wolverine), then did a better job on the second set in present day (Wolverine), and ended with a fantastic third film set in the future (Logan). That is rare.
In the MCU, they’ve done a great job on their trilogies so far. Captain America might be the gold standard with varying levels of excellence throughout. The Avengers simply just kept upping their game with Infinity War and Endgame. As a rule, you actually look forward to the third movie in the MCU.
Maybe it’s because when someone has a solid plan, backed up with solid creative talent, things tend to go well.
When they don’t plan properly, you tend to get the latest Star Wars trilogy. Yeah, you’d *think* that with over 40 years of history on the line, they would have approached the last trilogy intelligently, creatively and professionally. You’d think. Ah well.
Myself, I’m looking forward to Deadpool 3. It can’t get here fast enough. So I hope they start planning soon…..
















