Page 13

Live Action to Comics Adaptations…

Had a discussion about this recently. I love Star Trek, and I love comics, but I don’t really get into Star Trek comics. A few friends of mine have stated this as well. It’s something about the live action *possibly* being the only “valid” version in my head for some reason. I guess Trek being originally crafted for tv established some guidelines that don’t translate well into comics– for me anyway. Your mileage may very.

Comics are such a visual medium, I’m not sure why I’m not as taken with them in the case of adaptations from live action. Maybe I just wasn’t drawn to the art or the stories. I have gotten a few of them over the years but I barely scratched the surface. Thankfully for Trek in general, I *think* the comics have been popular enough over the decades. There have been a lot of them.

I don’t know, something about the live action version seems to be prohibiting me from getting the comics. As in…they did the live action so well, the comics are somewhat unnecessary.

But once in a while, the comics gave me something that wasn’t available in live action. There was a Trek comic series several years ago that I did dive into for a while. I believe it was called the Early Voyages, and starred Captain Pike and his original crew on the Enterprise. I gravitated toward this as I was always interested in the doomed Captain Pike*. That comic provided me with something that none of the tv series did, so that’s telling. Of course now Captain Pike and that crew are getting their own show on CBS all access, which I’ll eventually have to check out. I guess that’s the key — the comics are perfect for presenting something new and unseen in the live action universe. These limitations are of a visual nature though, as I’ve read tons of the Trek novels over the years.

All these rules and limitations apply for Doctor Who as well. Up until the last few years, DW has always been of such a caliber on tv that I’ve never needed or wanted to get into the comics version. I’ve seen bits and pieces of the current comics featuring the 13th Doctor and it’s very possible that the comics are producing better stories than the current showrunner, but admittedly, it’s a low bar.

One might say “Hold on….Rick, you adapted a giant, 168 page color graphic novel of a 12 part Doctor Who story back in 2012!” Yes, and the reason was two fold. One, most of the episodes of that story are among the missing and I felt it should have *some* visual representation. Two, it was my love letter to the show on it’s 50th anniversary.

I think about some other comic adaptations and it’s the same thing. Never been interested enough in a Simpsons comic to ever pick up an issue and they’ve been putting out a comic on the series for almost as long as the series itself has been around.

I guess maybe it’s just a matter of already having excellent live action Doctor Who and Star Trek in the past, I don’t need supplemental two dimensional images to enjoy. If I want to revisit Deep Space Nine, I’ve got seven full seasons to enjoy.

I guess another perspective is the reverse– comic book superheroes going to the big screen and tv. When done right, the characters are not only given that extra dimension but are often elevated far beyond what even the best comics provide.

I think that the best thing that can be said about the comics adaptations of live action shows is that as long as the quality is there, they’re keeping the brand alive and moving, even without that 3rd dimension.

Because the thing IS.

*The tale of Captain Pike is a sad one. He was a revered Captain of the Enterprise for many years. It was after handing over the Enterprise to James Kirk and being promoted to Fleet Captain that during a training exercise on the USS Republic, he was seriously injured while saving cadets. His tragic story has always piqued many people’s interest. The second season of Star Trek: Discovery sets up Pike for his spin off show, Star Trek: Strange New Worlds.

And Thus I… am content?

Phone conversation years ago with a friend. Started talking about our jobs. He had already been in a position which he was at his very best. That is to say, the vocation he seemed happiest in, in which he seemed to thrive. But he was always reaching for higher positions, more money. It was my opinion that he eventually elevated himself into positions with maybe more prestige and money but positions he was either less suited for or maybe he enjoyed less. He may think differently now in general, I don’t know.

But that’s the problem with The Ladder. Sometimes that top rung gives you some things but takes others away. Or you finally grab that brass ring and realize gold was what you really wanted.

The conversation turned to me and my job and he decided that since I wasn’t looking to reinvent myself or do a different job to maybe make more money and get prestige, that I was “content”. And oh, the way he said it. He was disgusted by it. No one should ever be content because to be content would somehow mean you’re just “settling” for your miserable lot in life. He was and is entitled to his thought process and opinion. I disagreed.

Because I’m on a completely different ladder. When it comes to drawing storyboards, I’ve risen to the top of my profession. That doesn’t mean I’m the best artist *doing* storyboards by any means. I’m not. But if you’re talking about the business end of it, financial reward, that “ladder” end of it, I made it to the top many years ago. It helps that I’m fast, efficient and focused on the job as well. It’s not usually easy and sometimes I get frustrated with almost every aspect of the business and the people in it, myself included. But that’s because it’s a job, not a wondrous unicorn petting zoo where everything is fun. I take pride in doing my job in a professional manner, even when I’m far less than I should be and don’t measure up.

But “prestige” is the sticking point with some people. You see, in some quarters of the advertising world, to draw is simply to be “a wrist”. You’re not writing, directing, producing or controlling projects in advertising, you’re “just” drawing. I’ve heard some in advertising talk about the latest campaign for soft drinks as something akin to brain surgery and how mankind is being elevated by the very nature of the prose in that deodorant ad. Not everyone in the biz thinks like this but some get caught up in it after a time.

If my ego desperately needs to produce, direct, write and/or control something, hell, I do that every time I do a comic and that’s actually all me.

Mind you, I love a good commercial. You don’t see them that much these days but they’re out there. Some are clever, some are funny, once in a great while, one is groundbreaking. But it’s not brain surgery and no one there is saving or elevating humanity. At the same time, there is good work to be done, without disparaging the artists, who actually can bring the ideas to life in ways no one else on the project can, if they know what they’re doing. But I digress.

I knew another guy –very nice guy, who used to draw storyboards, concept boards, promotional stuff, just like me. He was very happy on the board, drawing. It was his “best destiny”. Then came the day where the company decided that there was only so much money they would pay him to draw–he’d reached an artificial “ceiling”–so they elevated him up and off the board into management, so he could stop doing what he loved, to make more money and get prestige. He eventually was elevated into a type of office manager. Prestige and money. Then, after 20 years, the fired him. No idea if he ever went back to drawing.

I guess I have a few points here.

One is that there’s no lack of prestige in “just drawing”. In all of advertising especially, it might be the closest thing to a noble pursuit.

Whatever the pitch, *you’re bringing things to life on paper*, whatever the reason.

Two, don’t let anyone ever try and lead you away from doing what you love simply because it doesn’t fit with their life view, or their perception of what success should be.

Their Ladder is not your Ladder and they should mind their own climbing methods.

Being content with what you do, being happy with it is is not a dirty proposition. I find that the people who are never content now, will never be content ever. What’s good for some is not necessarily good for others. Let them do them. You do you.

Some folks will just never be satisfied with anything, no matter what.

I myself, try to do the best I possibly can in every situation. And although I’m never truly satisfied with any artwork I do, always thinking I could have done better (that’s where I’M always reaching), I try my best.

And thus… I am content.

Picard’s not so bad.

I’m speaking of CBS All Access’s Star Trek: Picard that aired earlier this year.

When I first heard they were doing the show, and that initially, Stewart didn’t want to do it but they talked him into it, it kinda sounded a bit like elder abuse.

Maybe done with smiles, arms around the shoulder and a truckload of money but passive elder abuse all the same.

I mean, the man is 80 for god’s sake and he refused.

And the whole notion also sounded like desperation, as in CBS needed subscribers for their streaming service, which was very understandable but true. They were building this whole service around new Star Trek, a mountain of old CBS reruns and whatever other new shows they could cobble together to pad content.

The main new tent pole show was Star Trek: Discovery but it was a brand new Trek offering, and since that’s always iffy, they wanted some old school insurance.

Thus, Picard.

I myself wanted nothing to do with desperation, elder abuse, and especially another streaming service. I really can’t encourage the multiplying business model/trend. I figured that if I heard enough glowing reviews, maybe I’d buy a season when it came out on Blu-Ray, or take advantage of a free trial. Suffice to say, I got the chance to watch the first season Picard for free. I WILL NEVER DISCLOSE OR CONFIM HOW I MANAGED THIS FEAT OF LEDGERDOMAIN!

Having done so, I can confirm that Stewart is indeed 80 years old and sounds like it, this whole thing does still smack a bit of desperation, there are somewhat gratuitous guest stars, and a fair amount of the acting is just so-so if your last name isn’t Stewart. Some well trod cliches are included as well and it’s a slow, somewhat boring build up. And, trying to be edgy, they drop lead F-bombs here and there and it usually sounds forced and really unnecessary most of the time, which is a bit lame and unfortunate.

But it’s Picard.

We see Data. Will. Deanna.

It’s good to see them for one last hurrah. As my friend John says, that alone is worth the price of admission.

Over all, it’s not a bad season, but I think at this point, sir Patrick deserves a quiet life. Just a couple of years ago, Stewart starred in Blunt Talk on Starz as a talk show host and he still had every bit of fire he always had. Now though, his age has caught up with him. Frankly, he sounds a bit feeble, and that’s because he’s 80, playing a character that’s 95, just like in Logan, where he played a Charles Xavier in his ’90’s. Mind you, it worked better there, as his character was very feeble and the most powerful mutant mind on earth had a severe case of dementia which could level cities.

Now don’t get me wrong, I have all the respect in the world for Sir Patrick and his acting skills are unparalleled. That being said, the producers of Picard should have some respect and leave the guy alone next time he says no!

Of course they’ll keep asking him though because Hollywood douchebags. And he’s a big boy who can take care of himself, so he should do him.

I think over all, the season was liked by the fans, which is a win.

If I’m them, I stop while I’m ahead, because the thing IS.

Risky business at the movies…

Due to the pandemic, movie theaters have mostly closed up shop, some have gone out of business. Sure, eventually, people will start going back into theaters to see movies. But it might be a long, long time before theaters have a packed house again. Can movie theaters wait that long? Can they pay their bills with a third of the people now safely spaced out to fill a theater? Is it even a third?

Do you alternate rows? Just have people sitting on the ends? Because the cramped excuse me, pardon me maneuver of scootching by people in close proximity trying to get to your seats in the middle of the row, forcing everyone to put their masks back on as you pass, since they’re in the middle of eating popcorn…. sounds like a bit of a cluster-F. I myself can’t imagine going into a theater with even a partial crowd now.

I usually don’t get concessions but a ton of people do….did. But will they now? They say that you have to be in fairly close proximity to someone for over 15 minutes with no protection for the infection to successfully spread. I don’t know how accurate that is, but if anyone *is* getting popcorn, candy and soda, and munching down while sitting one row away from others doing the same for three hours straight…. I think that’s maybe a little dicey.

And sure, maybe nobody will be getting concessions for a while, but that IS where a movie theater makes the vast majority of its profit. Now, heading into winter, cases are starting to skyrocket again. Government will probably ban all theater crowds soon anyway at this rate. Any way you want to cut it, it’s not looking great at the moment for movie theaters.

Chris Nolan put out Tenet (canary) in theaters (coal mine) a couple months ago to critical apathy and almost nonexistent crowds. I’d imagine hard core Nolan fans will show their appreciation by buying it later. Wonder Woman 1984 director Patty Jenkins is desperate to get her movie out in theaters ASAP, as she’s already starting to work on her next project with the wonderful Gal Gadot, Cleopatra.

Now, I’m all for Gal in any movie. I’m all for her as Cleopatra– kinda sounds perfect. I’m also all in favor of WW1984 hitting theaters ASAP. Not that I’ll go and see it there, no, I won’t, but the sooner it hits theaters, the sooner it can do its middling business, leave theaters, and come out on blu-ray. Then I’m in.

Same with Black Widow, but they pushed this back to next May unfortunately. Which means, I should finally see it a year from now. But that’s okay. I can wait. It’s a flashback. If the pandemic occurred a year earlier, and this was Endgame that was being delayed, yes, I absolutely would be losing my shit, and I might have even braved going to the theater to see it. Maybe. Or not.

But thankfully, the MCU lucked out when it came to taking their slight break in between massive storylines. 2020 only had the aforementioned Black Widow flashback and the Eternals scheduled.

I cannot express how little I care about the Eternals. It may be a terrific film. Perhaps the best ever in the MCU! (Mm, that’s a steep hill) But no, the particular property, The Eternals, no, don’t care, not a wit. Boring as hell. Created by Jack Kirby back in the ’70’s, they were even less interesting than the Inhumans.

The overrated Neil Gaiman — sorry, Sandman and most of his other stuff bores me to tears– did a reboot of The Eternals a decade or so back. Still boring. This will be the MCU’s greatest feat yet, making this lump of coal into a gem.

But you might say “Hold on, old chap, what about the Guardians of the Galaxy? They weren’t well known and their films are great!” Yes they are! I’ve always considered them a third rate property but James Gunn did an excellent job bringing the whole concept to life. Now the Guardians are truly first rate. I don’t consider the Eternals third rate at all. I consider them fifth rate. So, steeper hill but totally doable– and I hope they succeed! I just can’t get excited about the property. But I’m really digressing here.

My point is that as far as picking the year for a bit of a rest, once again, the gods smiled down upon MCU head honcho Kevin Fiege.

But at some point, for ALL these studios, they’re going to have to make some adjustments to their thinking, their schedules, and their budgets. Because the Hollywood machine can only get just so backed up with delays before certain movie chains have to fold up for good. Premiere something too soon, you risk losing hundreds of millions. Wait too long, you might lose the theaters you need to show them.

A smart plan might be converting the parking lot into a drive in.

But that probably won’t do a lot, showing one film in the parking lot …. of the neighborhood Lowes Cinemas 16 theater Omniplex.

So what DO you do with these Cubs?

The reasons/excuses for why the Cubs have basically disintegrated over the last four years are plenty. Lack of home grown talent, the collective bargaining agreement, Ricketts not wanting to spend more, Dexter Fowler left, and we didn’t have a lead off guy, blah blah blah.

The Cubs actually had good pitching this year. You could still count on Lester, Hendricks was great, Mills impressed and Darvish…yikes, Darvish was a madman.

No, I’m not blaming the pitching, although Aldolay might also be coming up permanently as well and I think next year looks to be a good year for the Cubs’ rotation. No, the problem is hitting.

The down and dirty is that the Cubs’ position players are inconsistent hitters, doing barely enough to keep their heads above water during the regular season and become useless in the post season. During the regular season, they’ll score 10 runs one game, then none the next, one the next, none the next, none the next, 12 the next. They have one hot streak, then play .500 ball the rest of the way.

Everybody blames the manager (bye Joe), the hitting coaches (there’s a looong list over the past decade), *everybody* but the hitters.

Madden even read a book on the proper way to handle millennials. Seriously. Are they delicate flowers who’d rather screw around with Call of Duty and Tik-Tok, or they professional baseball players? You’ve got to “know how to talk to them without hurting their feelings?” Really? Please.

For some reason, Rizzo, Bryant, Baez, Schwarber, Horner, Bote, & co. are just failing. The boys keep talking about how Theo developed a “winning culture” but where’s it been? What actually goes on in that clubhouse?

*Something* is poisoning the crew and it’s been going on for years now.

You’ll notice it overtakes new players a while after they join. A couple years ago, Daniel Murphy joined. He came in like a house afire and was hitting like crazy. Then after a spell in the Cubs clubhouse, his bat slowed to a crawl like the rest. “One of us.” Same thing happened to Nick Castellanos last year. He was a one man run machine but at the end, he drank the dopey kool-aid. Jason Kipnis was this year’s zombie convert. Came in swinging and then, the rest of the Cubbies rubbed off on him. Ian Happ was a force of nature early this season, then bloop. Sleeeeep.

The only guy on the whole team that’s the outlier is Jason Hayward. This guy is a conundrum. When he got here, his first year at the plate was horrible, then each subsequent year, he consistently got a bit better. After like five years, last year he was finally good and this year he had a career year! I think he’s still got two or three years left on the whopper of a contract but hey, if he’s now worth it, great! Let’s keep HIM.

Maybe it’s the five star Hollywood hotel and spa the clubhouse became? It’s majestic in there. Maybe it’s so nice, the Cubs just got real comfortable. Too comfortable. I don’t know, but when they change the hitting coaches *several* times, and change the manager, yet the guys STILL aren’t hitting, you know where the problem is.

So, we know who the problem children are. What happens next?

It’s obvious by now that there’s some kind of attitude in that clubhouse amongst the majority of the hitters that says “we know what we’re doing, we don’t need help”. They’re wrong, they’re arrogant, they’re unwilling to learn and grow. They’re sipping from the punchbowl of poison kool-aid and it’s not healthy. So…

Kyle Schwarber – since rising from injury like a combination of Superman and Lazarus just in time for the 2016 World Series, we’ve now waited an extra FOUR YEARS for him to go back to being that guy again. He hasn’t. How much longer do we wait before trading him, selling him, you name it? He’s gotta go.

And don’t get me wrong, I’m sure they’re all good guys and kind to small animals but who is it helping to keep this damaged, restricted, close minded, “we won’t change” mentality around?

Kris Bryant — former MVP, ROY, and lately, mostly injured. And he’s been in more mental slumps, injury induced slumps and slumps by association than almost anyone. Do we trade and get a few prospects for him? Each year, I get the feeling his value is diminishing before our eyes, along with the integrity of his skeletal structure. Maybe he’d do a lot better with a change of scenery? A lot of fan’s will call me stupid to want to get rid of him because he’s so great. Well yeah, I guess we can just hold onto him for another year and see if he actually stays healthy and productive for entire season like he did in ’16, but I haven’t been seeing a lot of upward trending with him either. I’m tired of waiting. Goodbye, KB.

David Bote – opposing pitches have figured him out and he really hasn’t been a factor. What can we get for him? Go.

Ian Happ – seems like a smart dude and if he can keep the power going, he will be an MVP candidate. I think he just needs the poison clubhouse kool-aid taken away. Once away from it, I think he’ll thrive. Keep him, please.

Javier Baez – who can ever figure out Javy? He was the worst he’s ever been at the plate this year. Was it really having no fans in the stands that screwed him up, or was the distraction his wife and kids, or something else? He’s one of the best ever in the field and yet he’s Sybil at the plate. What do you do? No idea. He’s too entertaining to get rid of. Or is he?

Nico Hoerner – I think he’s got massive potential but again, too much of whatever bad influence is in that clubhouse, the kool-aid, whatever. Get rid of the punchbowl but give him another shot.

Wilson Contreras – he’s hot and cold at the plate but a great catcher with a big arm. His temper and his attitude works against him sometimes, but if he does some maturing, seems like he’s got potential to be even better than he’s gotten so far.

Victor Caratini – gotta keep him. He’s got decent numbers at the plate, although, sure, he could be better. He’s a very good catcher. But his greatest value is his synergy with Yu Darvish. They work very very well together. Once Caratini started catching Yu, Darvish resurfaced as one of the best pitchers in baseball and is in the mix for Cy Young this year. It would be a *big* mistake in my opinion to get rid of Vic.

Anthony Rizzo. This one’s tough. He’s the unofficial captain of the club but does that mean he’s also pouring the kool-aid? He’s usually had a good mindset about choking up on two strikes, and I admire the professionalism but I sometimes wonder about the guy. Is he sending the wrong vibe through the clubhouse? If a lot of the guys look to him for leadership, is he doing something wrong or is he not stepping up properly in the first place? Is he joking and entertaining, or is he inspiring and leading?

And although during the regular season, he’s usually Mr. Consistent with well above average stats, he’s usually hitless in the postseason, like most of these guys.

This core of guys is still mostly intact from 2016. Maybe they lost 25% of the crew. Arietta, Lackey, Zobrist, Montero, Russell, Chapman. Still, they had most of those guys for ’17 and still had some of them in ’18 and ’19. So, I’m not exactly sure what happened after ’16.

Arrogance? Complacency? Some mixture of both?

There’s no good excuse. This team was better than the Dodgers in ’16, yet the Dodgers mowed them down in ’17, and now, the Dodgers have gone to the World Series three times in the last four years. At the very least, the Cubs and Dodgers should have been going back and forth making WS appearances since ’16.

When you look at the Cubs’ core hitters on paper all this time, it’s been quite the murderers row. And ever since ’16, I figured it was just a matter of time before Rizzo, Bryant, Baez, Schwarber, Contreras, Zobrist, and Heyward, most or all of them would get hot and be unbeatable again. I waited. And waited. And waited. Never happened.

So, we can all keep waiting because of ’16, or get rid of the deadwood, I suppose.

Doctor Who, The Animated Adventures! please?

I was cavorting around on Facebook, visiting the Character Option figures page. I’m not sure “cavorting” is the most accurate word for scrolling through an FB page but there, I’ve said it, let the bodies fall where they may.

Recently, Character Options released a very cool online exclusive (covered by the Doctor Who Companion among others, I’m sure) featuring two Peter Cushing DW movie Daleks that served as extras in the William Hartnell story, The Chase. I ordered my set, waited a week, allowing others to buy one, as I didn’t want to be greedy, and watched others order 5, 10, or in a couple instances 16 sets (!). Greedy, rich, cockeyed, huge fans, all of the above, who knows?

But after a week, there still some left, so I ordered a second set. As I was monitoring comments, it seemed like no one missed out or complained about missing out and eventually, all the sets– I’m led to believe 5,000 internationally, sold out. I just wanted to mention the Dalek figures but it was a slightly off kilter, fun idea selling Cushing movie Daleks since they were part of a tv Dalek episode. It was a fun, interesting idea.

Which brings me to…My Point.

WHILE cavorting, there was a post from Ricky Key, asking if anyone else thought it would be great to have a Doctor Who animated series by the animators who do the lost episodes?

I thought it was a great idea and the more I thought about it, the more I loved it. The possibilities are indeed endless. But the application….the application…

I know there is the one studio that’s been doing a lot of Troughton animation work over the past couple years. But with something like Doctor Who, The Animated Series, you’ve literally got over a dozen Doctors to work with. We’ve heard the likes of Tim Treloar impersonating Pertwee, Frazier Hines doing a great Troughton, and whoever it was who uttered that one line in Day of the Daleks– an excellent Hartnell impersonation!

Say they do a short season, maybe six, 25 minute episodes, meaning three, two part stories? Or any combination, a single, ep, a two parter and a three parter? But you could tailor make the story to any particular Doctor’s era. A Hartnell historical. A Troughton monster story. A psychedelic ’70’s Aikido fun fest with Pertwee and UNIT. You name it. Classic OR new era!

More or less, Big Finish with visuals. Which brings me to another point. Maybe Nick Briggs expands his territory and BF’s license. They’ve got a lot of writers. And voice talent. They could just take some audios they’ve already *done* and have them animated! Or they could think bigger. BF is always about having no limits to the locations of their adventures since it’s audio. Animate them. Sometimes, there arises certain situations where things get awkward in an audio as things get hard to communicate without an awkward verbal explanation. Now the writers and actors could lean on a visual aid if they needed to. Animate it.

Now, you might ask “Well professor, who’d be paying for this? I would first look in the direction of who’s been paying for things like animating the episodes of the Faceless Ones that already exist on video. Or paying for each of these stories to be animated in both color and black and white. Paying for complete, animated adventures. I might also look in the direction of Big Finish who are certainly bold and willing to go out on a limb. And yes, BBC America, which has the cash ready “America” already in its name.

And let’s get to the part where just *having* an animated series makes the over all Doctor Who catalog and portfolio look even better to prospective streaming partners and entities such as HBO MAX who would love more and more content.

And finally, it’s kind of hard to fathom that a franchise as old and storied as Doctor Who has never had a proper animated series. It’s past time.

Someone call Tennant. He’s in lockdown and will do ANYTHING!

Just when I thought there was nothing left to write about…Boom–COVID

Less than two months left on this blog experiment, so really, the timing of testing positive for COVID makes for an interesting left turn in the narrative. No idea who I got it from. There are at least a dozen suspects who may have been asymptomatic for two weeks and had no clue they were passing it along. The insidious nature of the bug almost makes it impossible to get ahead of. Meanwhile, my cancer history — the gift that keeps on giving– put me in a more vulnerable position regarding being susceptible.

How it all laid out (so far). First five days, I just felt “off”. Like maybe I was on the verge of getting a cold. Usually, when this happens, I get a good night sleep and the next day, I either have the cold or I’m right as rain. But no, even though I slept fine– I’ve been sleeping great the whole time–, I still just felt off. A bit fatigued, just dragging.

Day five, what few symptoms there were, a bit of congestion in my head, occasional sniffles, seemed to possibly indicate *maybe* sinus infection. I’ve had numerous sinus infections over the years, so this was a possibility. I went to the Doctor, and the redness in my ears, throat and nose seemed to back up my diagnosis, so Doctor gave me a Z-pack and sent me on my way. Four days later, no change, which was telling because after a few days with the Z-pack, there’s usually massive improvement– if it’s a sinus infection.

I let my Doctor know and she sent me to get tested. Went to Lisle DuPage Medical Group and their testing facility was down and there were a line of cars waiting for testing. We got diverted to another site for car side testing. They stick a swab up your nostrils.

Lot of people getting tested.

Currently, I’m just trying to breathe through my nose, because I’ve got an annoying cough that triggers when I take in too much air through my mouth or I say more than a few words. But aside from that, things aren’t too bad. I’m supposed to take it easy and push fluids. Will do.

Isolate for two weeks, then… I don’t know what. Get tested again? So little is known about this. If you get it, and recover, you’re not immune to getting it again. You might be immune for two months and then you’re back on the front lines. No guarantee it’ll be the same level of symptoms either. Could be better or worse.

Insidious.

I usually don’t leave the house anyway but now I feel like I’m in triple lockdown–as is the family.

The DC Multiverse is coming….somewhere….

The powers that be at ATT/Warner have seemingly begun to once again commit to the DC Cinematic Universe, with Wonder Woman 1984 just waiting to land *somewhere*, working on another Aquaman and prepping for Black Adam.

But maybe the most intriguing offering is the upcoming Flash movie starring Ezra Miller, “Flashpoint”.

It’s an adaptation of a comic event that led into “The New 52”, a very regrettable era in DC comics history stretching from roughly 2011 thru 2016 or so. It’s largely acknowledged now as a huge mistake and they’ve kinda disregarded the whole mess.

Now that’s not to say the Flashpoint comic was bad, nor does that mean the movie will be bad.

The basic thrust of the story is that the Flash races back through time to save his mother from being killed when he was a child. This of course screws up the timeline and the you’ve got multiple realities mashing about as Flash tries to fix things. Such a movie could soar or crash very easily, so fingers crossed that they’ve got a good script in place.

Evidently Ben Affleck likes the script because he signed up to appear once again as Bruce Wayne, but I’m not sure if he’ll be Batman. Alternate realities, yo!

And again, let’s hope that ol’ Ben actually sticks with his decision this time. He’s been flipping and flopping on returning to the role more than a captured marlin on uppers.

And there’s a rumor that Jeffrey Dean Morgan may reprise the role of Thomas Wayne, Bruce’s father. In Batman V Superman, Morgan plays Bruce’s father, who, along with his mother, who shall remain nameless, gets killed, leading to young Bruce taking the oath and changing his life for good. In the Flashpoint comic, the alternate reality that the Flash ends up in, it’s young Bruce that gets killed in the alley that night and Thomas, who takes the oath. so we’ll see if this actually happens in the film. It’s possible this was part of the plan all along, otherwise, why have Morgan only do a two minute cameo flashback in BVS?

But what’s even more exciting to me is the fact that Michael Keaton is *also* going to be appearing AS BATMAN. He’s IN.

I think the circumstances and reasons are possibly thus:

Number one, both Affleck and Keaton were interested in returning to the roles back when the CW tv shows did their Crisis on Infinite Earths miniseries. But the CW absolutely could not afford them, sadly.

Number Two, Keaton ROCKED a costume again when he starred in Birdman, which was a kind of sideways look at Keaton’s past as Batman, very cleverly done. Amazing film. During which, when they were building the Birdman costume, they used the old molds from the ’89 Batman costume. And it still fit. That has to pump you up a bit. He was excited and rightfully so.

Number three, Keaton has also been very much on a new high in his career with the aforementioned Birdman, Spotlight, as well as his take on the Vulture in the Spider-man franchise. I think he’s having fun.

Now sure, you’re thinking that hey, didn’t they eliminate all the other earths in the Multiverse back during the tv Crisis series? Well, no, as even at the end, to accommodate Stargirl and the Titans and Doom Patrol shows, they said other earths had begun to appear again, so yeah, Multiverse. It really is DC’s stock and trade.

A shame Marvel might just do it better with next year’s “Dr. Strange and the Multiverse of Madness”.

But you never know.

DC has the built in excuse to do whatever films they feel like with the same characters appearing in different films at the same time. It hasn’t really hit in full force yet but it’s coming.

By the time Flashpoint comes out, the first of a new Batman trilogy will have premiered with Robert Pattinson in the lead role, as a kind of year two Batman, early in the game, and although you could easily say it takes place in the early 2,000’s, and thus a younger version of the Affleck Batman, right now they’re just saying it’s a separate reality. (A lot of directors really don’t like to share)

It’s kind of like the Joker. You had the wonderful Jack Nicholson in ’89, possibly the definitive version by Heath Ledger in Dark Knight, the rather unimpressive gang banger in the even less impressive Suicide squad, and of course the rehash version that kinda rips off King of Comedy and Taxi driver. The people who really liked the Phoenix Joker film tend to be the people who hadn’t seen the movies it regurgitates rather shamefully.

But all of them are just more never ending extra alternate realities etc.

Whatever.

I’d just like them to be good.

Fingers crossed.

Cringe inducing television…

Admittedly, I may have higher standards than most when it comes to tv programs. I can get *very* particular. But tv has always had dumbed down stuff. When the folks were up, we watched The Masked Singer.

THE MASKED SINGER: Host Nick Cannon and Night Angel in the all-new “The Mother Of All Final Face Offs, Part 1” episode of THE MASKED SINGER airing Wednesday, April 8 (8:00-9:01 PM ET/PT) on FOX. CR: Michael Becker / FOX. © 2020 FOX Media LLC.

Seriously, how does Ken Jeong get work? I…. I just don’t get it. He’s like the Ryan Seacrest of comedy. Grandmothers must love him.

But most people set a low bar and have a high tolerance for mindless pablum. Just snap on the Love Boat and veg out. I envy them. They can watch virtually anything and the dreck that is reality tv gives them thousands of hours of content.

Meanwhile, my pickiness regarding tv shows results in me usually not having anything I want to watch.

Sometimes, digging through the annals of tv history, I do find some gems. Even though the history of tv is littered with 85% of it *always* being garbage, that 15% of quality stuff is there if you can find it. Good, solid, smartly written, wonderfully performed television. It’s like panning for gold. Yes, quite often, you’ll get loads of Diff’rent Strokes, Saved by the bell, and other detritus, but once in a while, you find a Yancy Derringer or a Maverick.

But then, there are the game shows from the ’70’s. And the ’80’s. Mother of god. I’m not sure who was the more insufferable, condescending prick, Alec Trebek on “Concentration” or Alan Ludden on “Password Plus”.

Seriously, if you are someone who is easily offended by how women are treated by men *today*, do NOT go back and tune in to Buzzer, the game show channel. Just don’t.

Betty White was married to Alan Ludden for years. Poor Betty.

And on Concentration….no, you know, Ludden was worse. I’ve watched a few episodes of Concentration and while Trebek has been and will always be a smug know-it-all, I can at least enjoy the puzzle. Ludden just has so many condescending jabs at women, I couldn’t make it all the way through one episode. Moving on…

Watching Concentration, the big prize was a new car from a range of like 12 different models all on stage in the background. Very elaborate and probably all very exciting back then.

But it was a collection of new cars in 1989. I’ve never seen a bigger bunch of compact, squat, wedged shaped, shitty looking cars in my life. Congrats!

Alec Trebek always gives the impression– no matter the show– that he would naturally know all the answers of every puzzle and question even if he *didn’t* have all the answers in his hands. Has anyone ever had HIM play Concentration? Or Jeopardy? ESPECIALLY Jeopardy? That would be enlightening. It could be hosted by Wink Martindale, or grab some other condescending guy from the era who could embarrass Alec the first time he makes a mistake.

As for Allen Ludden, he’s long since dead. How did Betty White put up with that jerk?

They say you’re not supposed to speak ill of the dead. I have no problem doing that if I thought the person in question was a jerk. If you really dislike someone when they’re alive, then you start praising said person unconditionally once they’re dead, that seems a bit disingenuous….

Who knows, maybe Ludden was a great guy in person, and just came across as a glad-handing creep on screen, where he condescended to women.

Poor Betty.

There was a point hidden somewhere in all this……

Notice how I threw Wink Martindale in there? That was a real dude. Game show host. I should imdb him….

“Wink”, lol.

The results of the imdb search might even be a blog if it’s interesting enough….

What my mom doesn’t say…part two

A few months ago, I did a blog entry involving the many things my mom never told me. Hidden gems that she’d parse out over the decades, peppering almost any salad-like event with bacon bits full of intrigue

A couple years ago on holiday, she dropped the bombshell that back in the ’60’s in Florida, her cousin Marylou, a singer, who was one night accompanied on piano by none other than Richard Milhouse Nixon. This was at some club where Marylou worked.

I think I was in my 20’s when she mentioned in passing that my father once punched a cop, etc., that type of thing.

The folks were up recently and while gathering (outside) with family, she filled in the rest of her work history from ’53 to ’62.

Now, I knew she was a nurse’s aide, which was in the mid ’50’s, but what I did NOT know was that she also worked for Ford, in the jet engine section as a secretary. She mentioned how spiffy the foreign guys looked in the division. We thought at first it was the German scientists being relocated after WWII, but no, those were rockets, not jets and these were Brits, not Germans.

Understandable mistake though, considering my mom was considered quite the hot platinum blonde back in the day, so one might naturally conclude there might be an aryan youth scenario emerging, with foreigners showing up, but no.

Nor did I know she was a hostess at a restaurant or two going into the ’60’s. She started working at McKesson drugs as a secretary in ’62, probably right after I was born. She of course would do that until ’77, until she became a pharmaceutical rep.

Of course whenever talking about the old days, there come reminders.

Mom has little patience for … anything with today’s social mores and is quick to remind me that she smoked the whole time she was pregnant with me.

I responded that yeah, I know, things were different back then, they didn’t know better.

She’s then quick to inform me that they did know better and the doctor even told her to quit smoking. And god bless her, she cut down a bit. Turns out, my father was never a smoker, but that was probably because he was busy being a big drinker. Everyone needs a hobby.

Expanding on 1962’s infant accessories, there were no such things as car seats back then either.

So presumably, infants were either just held comfortably by mom in the passenger seat, or tied to the roof, where wind friction would shear off any residual mucous from the birthing experience.

You could just lay the infant in the back seat but they’d just bounce around (this was also before seat belts were either used, or encouraged or invented). I can’t remember exactly. Probably because I was all mucousy and tied to the roof.

But of course, this was a different time. Everything was *just* starting to become color after all those millennia of black and white.

THE PAST!